Afraid of Onstorming Uniting Black Holes?
(Take telepathic twin geranium plants and send one into outer space. When it gets swallowed its brother at your window will tremble from shock. Which can be measured with fine apparatus on its leaves. There will be left a few seconds before it is your turn, just enough for a short prayer).
Black holes are based on the general theory of relativity which has the equivalence principle as a root, that says "a gravitational field and a non-inertial reference system are indistinguishable at a local scale". Although inert and gravitational masses are equal this equivalence principle is not correct since a charge in a gravitational field does not radiate while it does when accelerated in a non-inertial reference system. Another failure of the general theory of relativity is that it assumes rest mass to be constant. However a cloud of particles will compress due to mutual gravitational attraction and velocities will increase. If rest masses remain constant then their inert masses would increase and thus the inertia of the whole cloud. But it is impossible that the momentum of the inert mass of an isolated cloud of particles becomes bigger.
The special theory of relativity pushed the general one; today the special one can be interpreted as speed of light being constant to all moving observers at a certain time and a certain place because it depends on the potential of the total mass of the universe, which is a scalar and the same in all directions. It decreases with the expansion of the universe and so the speed of light also, becoming zero at the edge of the universe. Where everything looses speed and direction, gets in a totally quantum mechanical state, called Chaos. All this is explained very well in Vasily Yanchilin's book "The Quantum Theory of Gravitation" (2003). His main hypothesis is that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty and so a qualitative explanation of gravity is found: In the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less quantum mechanical transitions towards the farthest half than from the latter to the nearest half. Net result is movement of the particle in the direction of the external mass, which in daily language is called gravitational attraction. Einstein and before him Newton only gave quantitative descriptions. Einstein's general theory is of mathematical kind and does not agree with the generally accepted decrease of the unit of length near mass. Then namely atoms become smaller and electrons will speed up, which translates in higher radiation frequencies. Time is bound to physical processes and measured with these. It is not something abstract and please reflect on the following logical problem: Both in old and new theory intervals of time decrease near mass (page 192 of the book). This is interpreted by those sticking to the general theory of relativity thus that when far away from mass a second passes then only a fraction of a second passes near mass. In the new theory shorter interval means shorter duration of the physical processes and those processes run faster near mass, quite in agreement with the nature of time and its measurement as shown above. It can also be explained with the principle of least action: a photon seeks a route with as big steps (oscillations with low frequencies) as possible and a minimum of these. Therefore it does not pass mass in a straight line but on a parabolic track through a zone where time runs slower than just near that mass.
(Take telepathic twin geranium plants and send one into outer space. When it gets swallowed its brother at your window will tremble from shock. Which can be measured with fine apparatus on its leaves. There will be left a few seconds before it is your turn, just enough for a short prayer).
Black holes are based on the general theory of relativity which has the equivalence principle as a root, that says "a gravitational field and a non-inertial reference system are indistinguishable at a local scale". Although inert and gravitational masses are equal this equivalence principle is not correct since a charge in a gravitational field does not radiate while it does when accelerated in a non-inertial reference system. Another failure of the general theory of relativity is that it assumes rest mass to be constant. However a cloud of particles will compress due to mutual gravitational attraction and velocities will increase. If rest masses remain constant then their inert masses would increase and thus the inertia of the whole cloud. But it is impossible that the momentum of the inert mass of an isolated cloud of particles becomes bigger.
The special theory of relativity pushed the general one; today the special one can be interpreted as speed of light being constant to all moving observers at a certain time and a certain place because it depends on the potential of the total mass of the universe, which is a scalar and the same in all directions. It decreases with the expansion of the universe and so the speed of light also, becoming zero at the edge of the universe. Where everything looses speed and direction, gets in a totally quantum mechanical state, called Chaos. All this is explained very well in Vasily Yanchilin's book "The Quantum Theory of Gravitation" (2003). His main hypothesis is that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty and so a qualitative explanation of gravity is found: In the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less quantum mechanical transitions towards the farthest half than from the latter to the nearest half. Net result is movement of the particle in the direction of the external mass, which in daily language is called gravitational attraction. Einstein and before him Newton only gave quantitative descriptions. Einstein's general theory is of mathematical kind and does not agree with the generally accepted decrease of the unit of length near mass. Then namely atoms become smaller and electrons will speed up, which translates in higher radiation frequencies. Time is bound to physical processes and measured with these. It is not something abstract and please reflect on the following logical problem: Both in old and new theory intervals of time decrease near mass (page 192 of the book). This is interpreted by those sticking to the general theory of relativity thus that when far away from mass a second passes then only a fraction of a second passes near mass. In the new theory shorter interval means shorter duration of the physical processes and those processes run faster near mass, quite in agreement with the nature of time and its measurement as shown above. It can also be explained with the principle of least action: a photon seeks a route with as big steps (oscillations with low frequencies) as possible and a minimum of these. Therefore it does not pass mass in a straight line but on a parabolic track through a zone where time runs slower than just near that mass.
In astronomy the concept of an interval can be written mathematically and in old theory appears a factor which leads to black holes. Yanchilin derives from wave theory a new formula with that factor not in the root and by consequence black holes cannot exist, are just big masses. However when like around Earth little variation in factors occur then measurements still are not precise enough to make difference in results between old and new theory. The latter though does explain the "aberration" of Pioneer 11. Near very big masses those factors become important and check that around the Big Bang with its enormous concentration time ran very fast. This is not in agreement with supposed standstill of time near such a black hole. By the way the Big Bang originating from a point is also a mathematical construction. In physics a point does not exist because it has no dimensions.
So according the new theory from Russia the speed of light was much higher in the past and this leads to correction of the supernova Ia standard for measurement of distances. Then accelerated expansion of the universe disappears (the Nobel prize for it has to be returned) and the apparently flat universe becomes better understandable: photons are attracted by mass, also when "outgoing" by the mass of the universe behind and their speed decreases. Negative energy, inflation, a cosmological constant and black holes all become phantasy. Some years ago I sent Yanchilin's book to the Library of Congress. Another copy to the University of Amsterdam, where I studied almost fifty years ago. There the book was banned to a distant store house, difficult to reach by students who now stay ignorant. This suited promotion of an own theory of the professors, which had little or better no significance since it resolved not any problem. But a reward of a million euro Spinoza premium was received from friends! At the university of Utrecht was invented a renormalisation program to cure defects in the general theory of relativity. If the latter is wrong .........
Vasily Yanchilin widens our horizon, his book is written didactically very well - thanks also to the translator- and for the most accessible for those with less mathematical knowledge. Only a little writers-devil was active: still printed is "the constant of Planck"; just "the Planck" would be sufficient because it changes when c varies.
Resuming the principle of equivalence in the old theory: "it states that a gravitational field and a non-inertial reference system are equivalent in their essence". In the new theory "the gravitational field of the universe creates our space-time. The values of the speed of light and the Planck depend on the gravitational potential, while in a non-inertial system these do not change. A radical difference!"
The character of mass is problematic, just like that of electric charge. Einstein's famous formula about the relation between energy, mass and speed of light is not disputed and added is change of potential energy also into internal energy along this formula. In other words potential energy transforms not only into kinetic energy but with an (equal) quantum into internal energy or theorists have to write 2mgh.
Vasily Yanchilin may be invited to give a lecture with afterwards discussion. That is normal procedure in science, not banning his work like happened in the dark Middle Ages with to vested authority unwelcome new books.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten