the photon a quantum mechanical one way transition?

A hundred years ago when Einstein presented his general theory of relativity quantum mechanics did not exist. In 2003 Vasily Yanchilin wrote in his book The Quantum Theory of Gravitation that gravity can be explained as a pure quantum mechanical proces; such with the hypothesis that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty. This qualitative interpretation, while Newton and Einstein gave only quantitative descriptions, is that in the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less quantum mechanical transitions towards the farthest half than from the latter to the nearest half. Net result is displacement of the particle in the direction of the external mass. Thus broadened horizon makes possible a view on the photon as a travelling particle consisting of quantum mechanical transitions in one direction only, while when reacting it assumes wave form with quantum mechanical transitions in several directions, "reflecting" of these included and so with spatial increase of size. Passing p.e. also two holes. Next thinking about non locality should start, considering narration in the book about discontinuity. Perhaps mass can be understood as outcome of quantum mechanical transitions, for in an isolated object mass is not felt as if there were balance between those transitions. Yanchilin argues that rest mass was smaller in the past since an isolated cloud of particles will contract by its gravity while the impuls momentum does not change. Also he remarks that at the border of the universe everything turns into a pure quantum mechanical state with no directions, speeds, etc. left, all completely undetermined in regard with the world we observe. This should fit with increase of "mass", to be translated in more quantum mechanical activity, but a new description is to be sought. About dark mass: Yanchilin thinks that it might be relic of light, of abundant radiation which at last lost its ability to react by too much dispersion. He is busy with atomic clocks which should tick faster on Earth than in satelites, but no confirmation is obtained yet. Are the measurements not correct or could there be a shell of dark mass around the planet, which increases local mass potential and thus makes the second faster? Note that according the principle of least action a photon seeks to pass a mass with as big steps (oscillations with low frequency) as possible and a minimum of these. Such is acquired in a route not near mass but with some parabolic curve and thus indicating that near mass the second runs faster, oscillations increase, the atom gets smaller (we agree that the unit of length decreases there) and electrons emit more energy. An expert computer may deliver ciphers about increased mass equivalent from solar energy curving around Earth and consequences of lower binding energy of atoms in satelites for the clocks ticking. I have little time for further writing on this stuff and would like more detailed explanation on Wikipedia, but many persons there remove what does not agree with the general theory of relativity. Like in the dark Middle Ages books were burnt if not pleasant to vested authority. Also I am handicapped by violations of the freedom to aquire and distribute knowledge as the Universiteit van Amsterdam, (where I finished my studies) blocks normal use of the library, of the Internet there (the shelves often are outdated) for "outsiders".