correcting the atomic clock

Atomic clocks slow down near mass. They would stop completely in a black hole if not disintegrated already by compression and high temperature. The situation there might be like in the very young small universe at the pre-transparency stage with rapid physical processes. Which contradicts stand still of time near concentrated mass. Modern expressing in astronomy is that since Creation everywhere a same amount of time has passed but the speed of physical processes varies according the local gravitational potential. Near mass an atom is more compact and more energy is required by electrons to run the atomic clock. This may lead to the conclusion that what is on its display has to be adjusted. Or the general theory of relativity is not correct as it neglects that the new electron orbit is of second degree (compare surface of an object) while g changes linear. NIST maintains to have constructed an atomic clock precise to one second in a billion years. That is wrong because the universe changes; instead one may argue that the clock is precise to one billionth of a second at a certain place and a certain time. Vasily Yanchilin argues that a photon obeys to the principle of least action: It seeks a route along mass with as big steps (low frequency) as possible and a minimum of these. Observed is a lens effect, the photon passes at some distance of the mass. In his book Yanchilin explains that he Einstein followers confuse time and distance, The Quantum Theory of Gravitation, page 192: "decrease of intervals of time means decrease of the duration of physical processes". Not: "If at far distance from mass one second passes then near mass only parts of a second will pass and time slows down." According Poincaré (read CJPAS) the unit of distance can be taken to vary when describing the atom at different g's and this makes superfluous to use the complicated Riemann maths. According Yanchilin gravity may be a pure quantum mechanical process. With hypothesis that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty a particle in the half of an object nearest to an external mass will have less quantum mechanical transitions towards the other half than what occurs in the farthest half. Net result is what in common language is called attraction by gravity. Research then has to be focused on variation of the sum of local g plus that of the universe for discovering the quantity of incorrectness of atomic clocks.

   Also regarding entanglement Yanchilin contributes: A photon only can start only at zero position and if next it is split there there will be two opposite waves, Traveling as a particle can be neglected as such would cause many collissions. A photon travels as a wave with some lateral extension. Between start and arrival a photon uses up a whole number of waves. Were it different then chaos would result and thus all energy flows to the path with a whole number of waves while the parallel parts on the road get extinct. This must also be valid for an electron that changes orbit within the atom. Otherwise chaos would result. So entanglement reflects at the destination the situation at the source. There will be balance of in the opposite directions sent energy because there is a start from zero. Jumping of electrons within the atoms of atomic clocks means going to a new orbit of two dimensions while g varies in one dimension. The involved energy must fit and reflect the difference in dimensions. Thus entanglement reflects at arrival the situation at the source. The split here must be free of phase difference because all starts from zero.

  Notice that light travels through zones with different g's. That involves use of energy because of the mass-energy equivalence. If this is not coming from outside the photon may provide from itself or some redshift appears. Therefore the present time scale is not certain.