nog eens:
NIST, the American institute for measuring, maintains to have an atomic clock precise to one second in a billion years. That is wrong because the universe changes. The clock might be precise tot one billionth per second. Since Creation everywhere in the universe the same amount of time has passed. Modern way of expressing is that the speed of physical processes varies in agreement with the local gravity potential. It appears that atomic clocks run slower in satelites than on Earth where gravity is higher. That contradicts new theory wich rejects the general theory of relativity and is in agreement with the very fast processes in the young very concentrated universe. Or stilstand of time in black holes is nuts. The photograph of a black hole was an artificial composition; in reality the thing may be a relict or new forming of the stuff with very high temperature before the universe became transparent. Around it one can see light, but an opening to make us see a black hole is cheating. In his book The Quantum Theory of Gravitation (2003) Vasily Yanchilin explains the well known lens effect: A photon obeys to the principle of least action and seeks near mass a route with as big steps (oscillations of low frequency) as possible and a minimum of these. Observed is a route not close to the passed mass which means that near that mass time runs faster, quite in agreement with the situation in the young universe. Or in modern saying: the physical processes run faster near mass and Einstein was wrong. But the special theory of relativity holds if there is a relation between the speed of light and the local g, which is a scalar and in every direction the same. So the speed of light c is the same in every direction at a certain place and a certain time.
In an atomic clock jumping electrons need energy which varies to the local g because the atom gets smaller, more compact at big g's. While the g changes linear the moving electrons get new place on what may be simplified to a surface, which is of two dimensions. That is why the atomic clock has to be corrected and this must be done for combination of the local g plus that of the universe. So far my contribution and research may be started all over the world to get quantitative results.
The russian scientist Yanchilin, now living in New York and publishing in the Canadian Journal of Pure and Applied Science, quoted Poincaré who argued that the difficult Riemann geometry is not necessary if the unit of length is taken as varying. Read in his book about red shift, which is misunderstood by most scientists. Further in my opinion a photon crossing the universe passes different zones of gravity and as there is equivalence between mass and energy on its journey use of energy is involved. If that does not come from outside the photon itself sees to it and that may cause some red shift. Which regards the time scale of the universe! Another question to be answered is whether a wave concentrates its energy to a whole number of oscillations and thus entanglement starts with dividing from zero into two halves that are reflected at the destination.
Remarkable is Yanchilin's work where he explains gravity as a pure quantum mechanical process: With hypothesis that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty in the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less quantum mechanical transitions (compare spilling of overcooked milk) towards the farthest half than the other way. In common language this is called attraction by gravity and explains too why it is relatively weak and not reversible.
Best is to organize a conference where all these new visions are discussed. But first read Yanchilins book in order to avoid questions that are already answered.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten