time and gravitation
Curvature of a photon's track near mass may require more analysis: when the duration of the second changes near mass this happens linear. But attraction of the photon has quadratic component. Which is in agreement with the new theory on gravitation as transitions a la Heisenberg are in disbalance near an external mass and pass the two-dimensional separation in the model with nearer and farther halves (see below). So already far away from the mass to be passed a nearing photon changes (to a distant observer) its path due to gradual difference in length of the second. (Although in own geometry it follows a straight line through so called curved space). Only much later the gravitational attraction between the mass and the photon becomes significant and dominant.
Yanchilin explains that change in potential is equal to 2mgh, double of the Newtonian version because the latter does not involve change of potential energy into internal energy. This change is very small compared to the huge internal energy described by Einstein as product of mass and quadratic c. Well known observations on planet Mercury therefore fit in Yanchilin's theory.
Now for faster or slower second near mass: In Yanchilin's vision a middle way is sought (page 191 of his book) between shortest distance (a slight curve around the mass) and longer second far away (bigger steps or lower frequency). Then the first part of the trajectory might look like somewhat hyperbolic while near the mass it changes into a parabole because of gravitational attraction.
In Einstein's version slower second near the mass requires already deflection of the photon to it instead of evading movement (Please fill in appropriate terms; my own language is dutch). Then the amounts of curvature will be different in both theories. Can the real curvature be measured somewhere, p.e. with help of galactic lenses, and compared to the theoretical models?
Curvature of a photon's track near mass may require more analysis: when the duration of the second changes near mass this happens linear. But attraction of the photon has quadratic component. Which is in agreement with the new theory on gravitation as transitions a la Heisenberg are in disbalance near an external mass and pass the two-dimensional separation in the model with nearer and farther halves (see below). So already far away from the mass to be passed a nearing photon changes (to a distant observer) its path due to gradual difference in length of the second. (Although in own geometry it follows a straight line through so called curved space). Only much later the gravitational attraction between the mass and the photon becomes significant and dominant.
Yanchilin explains that change in potential is equal to 2mgh, double of the Newtonian version because the latter does not involve change of potential energy into internal energy. This change is very small compared to the huge internal energy described by Einstein as product of mass and quadratic c. Well known observations on planet Mercury therefore fit in Yanchilin's theory.
Now for faster or slower second near mass: In Yanchilin's vision a middle way is sought (page 191 of his book) between shortest distance (a slight curve around the mass) and longer second far away (bigger steps or lower frequency). Then the first part of the trajectory might look like somewhat hyperbolic while near the mass it changes into a parabole because of gravitational attraction.
In Einstein's version slower second near the mass requires already deflection of the photon to it instead of evading movement (Please fill in appropriate terms; my own language is dutch). Then the amounts of curvature will be different in both theories. Can the real curvature be measured somewhere, p.e. with help of galactic lenses, and compared to the theoretical models?
According to Vasily Yanchilin in his book The Quantum Theory of Gravitation (2003) black holes do not exist. In the book he derives a corrected formula for an interval and adds that Einstein was wrong with his idea of slower second near mass. A photon passing mass does so (principle of least action) with as big steps (oscillations with low frequency) as possible and a minimum of these. Everybody agrees that near mass the unit of distance becomes smaller and thus the length of a path increases. To a distant observer then the photon follows a parabolic route near mass, where time runs slower. If Einstein were right a hyperbolic track would be observed.
Consider reduction of the unit of length in an atom. Then the electrons have to move faster around the nucleus since charge does not change. Time is measured at real physical processes like radiation by electrons. When the energy of the electrons becomes bigger near shrinking atom and nucleus (radio-active processes may also change, p.e. beta decay) the rate of time passing increases or the second runs faster. Black holes are not in agreement with the big concentration at the Big Bang where processes were very fast. The gravitational theory of Yanchilin has pure quantummechanical character, while Newton and Einstein gave only quantitative description: In the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less transitions to the farthest half (underlying hypothesis is that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty) than from the latter half to the nearest one. Net result is movement towards the external mass. Perhaps when external mass is absent inertial mass is not felt because there is balance. I propose to split a laser beam and lead the components through a cascade of prisms at different heights. Where the second won't be the same and thus neither frequency and refraction; cascades should enable to do measurements. See the book for more, both in language and maths excellent stuff. Only "the constant of Planck" just may be called "the Planck" as it changes if Yanchilin is right. If he is right the standard supernovae Ia has to becorrected for faster c in the past, when the universe was more concentrated, and accellerated expansion of the universe becomes phantasy. The Nobel prize 2011 then has to be returned. Likewise inflation, negative energy, the cosmological constant become superfluous.
Consider reduction of the unit of length in an atom. Then the electrons have to move faster around the nucleus since charge does not change. Time is measured at real physical processes like radiation by electrons. When the energy of the electrons becomes bigger near shrinking atom and nucleus (radio-active processes may also change, p.e. beta decay) the rate of time passing increases or the second runs faster. Black holes are not in agreement with the big concentration at the Big Bang where processes were very fast. The gravitational theory of Yanchilin has pure quantummechanical character, while Newton and Einstein gave only quantitative description: In the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less transitions to the farthest half (underlying hypothesis is that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty) than from the latter half to the nearest one. Net result is movement towards the external mass. Perhaps when external mass is absent inertial mass is not felt because there is balance. I propose to split a laser beam and lead the components through a cascade of prisms at different heights. Where the second won't be the same and thus neither frequency and refraction; cascades should enable to do measurements. See the book for more, both in language and maths excellent stuff. Only "the constant of Planck" just may be called "the Planck" as it changes if Yanchilin is right. If he is right the standard supernovae Ia has to becorrected for faster c in the past, when the universe was more concentrated, and accellerated expansion of the universe becomes phantasy. The Nobel prize 2011 then has to be returned. Likewise inflation, negative energy, the cosmological constant become superfluous.
In order to protect own research of both universities in Amsterdam I have no access anymore to their scientific libraries. This makes my contributions more limited. In 2011 a million euro Spinoza premium was awarded to researchers there for an own theory of little or no value and to promote this they banned Yanchilin's book to a place where students cannot easily read it and thus stay ignorant. See on this site some years ago "kattekwaad", a short theatre play.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten