When measuring time the role of gravity has to be considered. According theory of a hundred years ago, formulated by Einstein, near mass the second becomes slower. However Vasily Yanchilin explains in his book The Quantum Theory of Gravitation (2003) that the general theory of relativity is wrong:
When a photon passes mass it tries to do so in agreement with the principle of least action. It seeks a path with as big steps (oscillations of low frequency) as possible and a minimum of these. Everybody agrees that near mass the unit of length shrinks and distances become bigger. So the photon takes a parabolic route with on its own clock least time spent. If Einstein were right a hyperbolic track would be observed.
Faster second near mass means that in the past when the universe was more concentrated the speed of light was substantially larger and this involves correction of the supernova Ia standard. Then accellerated expansion of the universe disappears and the Nobel prize 2011 physics has to be returned.
Newton and Einstein only gave quantitative description of gravity but Yanchilin explains it qualitatively as a pure quantummechanical process, based on the hypothesis that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty: In the half of a particle nearest to an external mass occur less quantummechanical transitions towards the farthest half than from the latter to the nearest half. Net tresult is movement of the particle towards the external mass.
Yanchilin explains the 1919 observations on Mercurius with in part change of internal energy (from 2mgh) according the Einstein formula relating mass and speed of light. The special theory of relativity stays valid if understood thus that c is related to the potential of the total mass of the universe (hypothesis) and this is the same in all directions at a certain place and a certain time. But changes with the expansion of the universe to become zero at its "edge". There everything becomes undetermined, looses speed and direction, will be in a pure quantummechanical state, while inside the universe mass reduces this.
Yanchilin derives a better formula for an interval and the black holes thus become non-existent, are just very big masses. Also negative energy, inflation and the cosmological constant change into phantasy. Wikipedia boycotts the russian scientist like in the dark Middle Ages to vested authority unwelcome books were burnt. I hope you will read his book and give comment. I gave a copy to the Universiteit van Amsterdam but it was put into a distant storehouse where students have no easy access. So they stay ignorant. This in order to promote an own theory of the professors that has little or better no value, and get then from friends a million euro Spinoza premium for it.
The book is written didactically very well. Except for a few printing mistakes I noticed that the author continues talking about the "constant of Planck"although it varies in his theory and therefore just may be called "the Planck".
Main mistake of Einstein was to propose constancy of the speed of light in vacuum as a working hypothesis. There is no real vacuum in the universe since radiation is everywhere and this is related to mass. Research should be done quantitatively whether supposed giant masses ("black holes") in the centre of galaxies are really necessary as enormous amounts of radiation fill all of space there.
When a photon passes mass it tries to do so in agreement with the principle of least action. It seeks a path with as big steps (oscillations of low frequency) as possible and a minimum of these. Everybody agrees that near mass the unit of length shrinks and distances become bigger. So the photon takes a parabolic route with on its own clock least time spent. If Einstein were right a hyperbolic track would be observed.
Faster second near mass means that in the past when the universe was more concentrated the speed of light was substantially larger and this involves correction of the supernova Ia standard. Then accellerated expansion of the universe disappears and the Nobel prize 2011 physics has to be returned.
Newton and Einstein only gave quantitative description of gravity but Yanchilin explains it qualitatively as a pure quantummechanical process, based on the hypothesis that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty: In the half of a particle nearest to an external mass occur less quantummechanical transitions towards the farthest half than from the latter to the nearest half. Net tresult is movement of the particle towards the external mass.
Yanchilin explains the 1919 observations on Mercurius with in part change of internal energy (from 2mgh) according the Einstein formula relating mass and speed of light. The special theory of relativity stays valid if understood thus that c is related to the potential of the total mass of the universe (hypothesis) and this is the same in all directions at a certain place and a certain time. But changes with the expansion of the universe to become zero at its "edge". There everything becomes undetermined, looses speed and direction, will be in a pure quantummechanical state, while inside the universe mass reduces this.
Yanchilin derives a better formula for an interval and the black holes thus become non-existent, are just very big masses. Also negative energy, inflation and the cosmological constant change into phantasy. Wikipedia boycotts the russian scientist like in the dark Middle Ages to vested authority unwelcome books were burnt. I hope you will read his book and give comment. I gave a copy to the Universiteit van Amsterdam but it was put into a distant storehouse where students have no easy access. So they stay ignorant. This in order to promote an own theory of the professors that has little or better no value, and get then from friends a million euro Spinoza premium for it.
The book is written didactically very well. Except for a few printing mistakes I noticed that the author continues talking about the "constant of Planck"although it varies in his theory and therefore just may be called "the Planck".
Main mistake of Einstein was to propose constancy of the speed of light in vacuum as a working hypothesis. There is no real vacuum in the universe since radiation is everywhere and this is related to mass. Research should be done quantitatively whether supposed giant masses ("black holes") in the centre of galaxies are really necessary as enormous amounts of radiation fill all of space there.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten