Do we originate from a point?
There is difference between maths and physics as in the latter a point does not exist because it has no dimensions. The so called Big Bang never has been proven and neither is so inflation, for the recent observations on the South Pole allow other interpretations. Perhaps according the theory of Vasily Yanchilin, described below. He argues that in the early period of the universe the factor rest mass was much smaller, while c much bigger. The book of the russian scientist should be studied and contra-argumentation has to be given if possible. When factors vary little both the old general theory of relativity and the new one give about same results. Very controversial in Einstein's theory is that the second gets slower near mass while around the Big Bang it must have had very high tempo.
Einstein's old theory of a century ago, before quantummechanics existed, is based on the hypothesis of constant speed of light in vacuum and slower second near mass. Einstein took this only as a temporary hypothesis; he could not image that something might exist that was not related anyway to other things. Everybody knows that such relations must exist since c changes when not in vacuum, deflection occurs and influence of the masses of the universe behind the travelling photon will also be felt. Yanchilin argues that near mass time runs faster, like at the enormous concentration around the so called Big Bang, while also the propagation of electromagnetic waves was speedier in the past. This drops to zero at the edge of the universe, where everything becomes undetermined, loosing normal movement and direction. The inflation theory, which is not founded on any physical law, assumes that c was the same all the time. If c varies probably need of inflation disappears. Also then the supernova Ia standard has to be corrected and accellerated expansion of the universe, caused by "negative energy" becomes phantasy: The Nobel prize physics 2011 has to be returned. Read what Yanchilin says about negative energy and the cosmological constant. The book is available by googling the author's name. Wikipedia boycots the russian scientist like in the dark Middle Ages to vested authority unwelcome books were burned. Einstein constructed a mathematical concept of gravity, describing its effects like Newton did before. Both not reaching qualitative explanation. Vasily Yanchilin is the first to present such with gravity as a pure quantummechanical process:
This based on on hypothesis that near mass the Heisenberg uncertainty becomes smaller. So in the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less quantummechanical transitions towards the farthest half than from the latter to the nearest one. Net result is movement of the particle towards the external mass, which in common language is called gravitational attraction. Further research should concern not feeling mass when other mass is absent, as if there is balance in those quantummechancial transitons.
Yanchilin's formula for an interval with value k (see page 190), different than in the general theory of relativity, is derived with the principle of least action and leads to faster second near mass. Further explanation: a photon tries to pass a mass with as big steps (oscillations with low frequency) as possible and a minimum of these. Everybody agrees that near mass the unit of length becomes smaller and distances bigger. So the photon takes a parabolic trajectory where time on its own clock is minimal while bigger for an observer at distance. Einstein confused time by regarding it as of the same nature as distance. In reality when a physical process takes less time then the total duration decreases while shorter unit of length makes total distance increase. When in an atom with certain mass the unit of length shrinks then the atom becomes smaller and as the electric charges do not change the electrons have to run faster. Which means emitting shorter frequencies or duration of the second decreases. In the general theory of relativity this is neglected.
Yanchilin adds change of potential energy into internal energy according Einstein's formula E = m . c quadr. The latter was quite unknown in Newton's age and the change is very small in comparison with the total; thus in daily life it plays no role. So 2mgh is the right change and with this also the Mercurius 1919 measurement can be understood.
The book, extremely well written didactically, contains much more, p.e. about redshift of sunlight. In the general theory this is caused by overcoming the sun's graviational attraction plus slower second at the sun while not the sum of both is measured. Yanchilin gives correct info.
There is difference between maths and physics as in the latter a point does not exist because it has no dimensions. The so called Big Bang never has been proven and neither is so inflation, for the recent observations on the South Pole allow other interpretations. Perhaps according the theory of Vasily Yanchilin, described below. He argues that in the early period of the universe the factor rest mass was much smaller, while c much bigger. The book of the russian scientist should be studied and contra-argumentation has to be given if possible. When factors vary little both the old general theory of relativity and the new one give about same results. Very controversial in Einstein's theory is that the second gets slower near mass while around the Big Bang it must have had very high tempo.
Einstein's old theory of a century ago, before quantummechanics existed, is based on the hypothesis of constant speed of light in vacuum and slower second near mass. Einstein took this only as a temporary hypothesis; he could not image that something might exist that was not related anyway to other things. Everybody knows that such relations must exist since c changes when not in vacuum, deflection occurs and influence of the masses of the universe behind the travelling photon will also be felt. Yanchilin argues that near mass time runs faster, like at the enormous concentration around the so called Big Bang, while also the propagation of electromagnetic waves was speedier in the past. This drops to zero at the edge of the universe, where everything becomes undetermined, loosing normal movement and direction. The inflation theory, which is not founded on any physical law, assumes that c was the same all the time. If c varies probably need of inflation disappears. Also then the supernova Ia standard has to be corrected and accellerated expansion of the universe, caused by "negative energy" becomes phantasy: The Nobel prize physics 2011 has to be returned. Read what Yanchilin says about negative energy and the cosmological constant. The book is available by googling the author's name. Wikipedia boycots the russian scientist like in the dark Middle Ages to vested authority unwelcome books were burned. Einstein constructed a mathematical concept of gravity, describing its effects like Newton did before. Both not reaching qualitative explanation. Vasily Yanchilin is the first to present such with gravity as a pure quantummechanical process:
This based on on hypothesis that near mass the Heisenberg uncertainty becomes smaller. So in the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less quantummechanical transitions towards the farthest half than from the latter to the nearest one. Net result is movement of the particle towards the external mass, which in common language is called gravitational attraction. Further research should concern not feeling mass when other mass is absent, as if there is balance in those quantummechancial transitons.
Yanchilin's formula for an interval with value k (see page 190), different than in the general theory of relativity, is derived with the principle of least action and leads to faster second near mass. Further explanation: a photon tries to pass a mass with as big steps (oscillations with low frequency) as possible and a minimum of these. Everybody agrees that near mass the unit of length becomes smaller and distances bigger. So the photon takes a parabolic trajectory where time on its own clock is minimal while bigger for an observer at distance. Einstein confused time by regarding it as of the same nature as distance. In reality when a physical process takes less time then the total duration decreases while shorter unit of length makes total distance increase. When in an atom with certain mass the unit of length shrinks then the atom becomes smaller and as the electric charges do not change the electrons have to run faster. Which means emitting shorter frequencies or duration of the second decreases. In the general theory of relativity this is neglected.
Yanchilin adds change of potential energy into internal energy according Einstein's formula E = m . c quadr. The latter was quite unknown in Newton's age and the change is very small in comparison with the total; thus in daily life it plays no role. So 2mgh is the right change and with this also the Mercurius 1919 measurement can be understood.
The book, extremely well written didactically, contains much more, p.e. about redshift of sunlight. In the general theory this is caused by overcoming the sun's graviational attraction plus slower second at the sun while not the sum of both is measured. Yanchilin gives correct info.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten