How far will reach the new telescope in distance and time? Consider that "every physical process involves energy". There is no exception regarding the displacement of a photon, which possesses a material aequivalent. Is for its travelling internal energy used by reducing frequency then the Hubble needs some adjustment. Does the amplitude dwindle then (as in the other case) zero will appear at the border of the universe. The same if the speed of light lessens by an external force that works on the photon system. Infinity, meaning that the photon receives energy all the time, is beyond our horizon. Note also that a point is a mathematical concept and does not exist in physics because it has no dimensions. For the Creator it will have been much easier to start with a (three dimensional) field than to have all physical laws propped up in kind of a singular point.
Shall the giant new telescope bring info about the plasma in the early universe? That stuff may also exist in so called black holes if time runs faster near mass. The latter is in accordance with the swift processes in the young very concentrated universe. It is also confirmed by the principle of least action: A photon seeks a path with "as big steps (oscillations of lower frequency) as possible and a minimum of these" (Yanchilin: The Quantum Theory of Gravitation, 2003). Observed is not a route close to the mass, where these frequencies thus must be higher or the second shortens. This russian scientist, site top-formula.net, published in the CJPAS on Poincaré's idea that euclidian geometry can be used in astronomy if the unit of length is taken as a variable. Talking of trains through tunnels at the speed of light raises much confusion. It is same time everywhere in the universe but the speed of physical processes changes near mass. In the energy mass formula c is only a scale factor. Constant speed of light was introduced as a working hypothesis but without explanation why it should be constant became base of the general theory of relativity. Yanchilin argues that c was much bigger in the past, which causes to adjust the info from supernovae Ia and accellerated expansion of the universe, driven by negative energy, disappears. He relates the gravitational potential of all the masses in the universe to the square of c. That potential is a scalar and in all directions the same at a certain place and a certain time. This clarifies the special theory of relativity.
A force from outside working on the photon system can be interpreted as a derative of that potential. To check change of c Yanchilin proposes an experiment with atomic clocks, which I think can be performed on the beach and the 700 m high volcano of the quiet Caribean Island Saba. During a few weeks the ticking of each clock is counted; in between swimming, etc. is attractive. Next the amounts of ticking are compared. Note that measuring in planes goes wrong if to the ticks on the ground are not added those during the time the second in the plane is longer or the other way. The smaller atom near mass complicates a bit regarding the electron transitions. On the universal clock with everywhere the same time since Creation 300.000 km/sec will bridge more or less distance along different physical proceedings on the beach and on the volcano.
Would mankind be unhappy if Yanchilin got it right? (Since the leading american universities are about to invent the perpetuum mobile driven by negative energy). Don't forget to read about Yanchilin's view of gravity as a pure quantum mechanical process: With hypothesis that mass reduces the Heisenberg uncertainty in the half of a particle nearest to an external mass there will be less quantum mechanical transitions towards the farthest half than the other way. Net result is displacement of the particle towards the external mass and sadly for sf authors this is not reversible.
Wellicht is er een congres te houden over wat er onderweg met of aan het foton gebeurt.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten